Model comparison

Command R+ vs Ministral 3B

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 44× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 2 categories and Ministral 3B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R+ leads 36.4 to 10.4.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Ministral 3B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+ and Ministral 3B specifications
Command R+Ministral 3B
ProviderCohereMistral AI
Noometry Index32.426.2
Released2024-08-302024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K131K
Max output4K262K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.10
Results tracked346

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Ministral 3B
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
LMArena Coding1187—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Ministral 3B leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Ministral 3B
DTBench54.9%51.7%
LMCA5%5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34118.1
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1186—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Command R+ leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Ministral 3B
LiveBench Math21.3%—
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 5—14.4%

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Ministral 3B
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%7.3%
GPQA Diamond—25.3%
LMArena Expert1174—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Ministral 3B
LMArena Non-English1216—
LMArena Chinese1226—
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Ministral 3B
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1197—

Long Context Not comparable

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Ministral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1230—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Ministral 3B
LMArena Text1229—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1213—
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Ministral 3B?

Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 44× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R+'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 3B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Ministral 3B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper