Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.0

Rank #251 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.0

Rank #90 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 38.2 to 8.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 17.4% for Command R+ and 57.9% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper at $0.95 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command R+Kimi K2.7 Code
ProviderCohereMoonshot AI
Noometry Index32.043.0
Released2024-08-302026-06-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output4K262K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.95
Output $ / M tokens$10$4
Results tracked3419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Command R+: 28.6 (#304), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)

BenchmarkCommand R+Kimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
LMArena Coding1187—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
ALE-Bench—886.23
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command R+: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)

BenchmarkCommand R+Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Command R+: 8.9 (#341), Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)

BenchmarkCommand R+Kimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench17.4%57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.28150.01
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1186—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Command R+: 26.6 (#239), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)

BenchmarkCommand R+Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
LiveBench Math21.3%—
LMArena Math1188—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Command R+: 35.9 (#165), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)

BenchmarkCommand R+Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
LMArena Expert1174—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R+: 38.8 (#222), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkCommand R+Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1216—
LMArena Chinese1226—
LMArena French1208—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command R+: 60.2 (#249), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkCommand R+Kimi K2.7 Code
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1197—

Long Context Not comparable

Command R+: 37.3 (#214), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkCommand R+Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1231—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command R+: 43.7 (#223), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkCommand R+Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1229—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1213—
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper. It lists at $0.95 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.7 Code does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper