Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs MiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 9.2.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R+MiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index32.443.6
Released2024-08-302026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K262K
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.28
Results tracked3418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding11871466
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts11861445
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math11881430
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert11741449
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Command R+: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English12161404
LMArena Chinese12261465
LMArena French12091447
LMArena German12161399
LMArena Japanese11661317
LMArena Korean11381355
LMArena Russian12271412
LMArena Spanish11891434

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following11971428
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query12301442

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

BenchmarkCommand R+MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text12291423
LMArena Creative Writing12351392
LMArena Multi-Turn12131445
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command R+ or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper