Model comparison

Command R+ vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 25.0 to 9.2.
  • Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R+ and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
Command R+Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderCohereTencent
Noometry Index32.437.9
Released2024-08-30—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding11871270
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts11861264
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math11881274
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert11741248
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English12161262
LMArena Chinese12261319
LMArena Russian12271258
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following11971245
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query12301301

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text12291274
LMArena Creative Writing12351242
LMArena Multi-Turn12131275
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R+ or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper