Model comparison

Command R+ vs Granite 4.1 8b

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Granite 4.1 8b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 25.7 to 9.2.

Side by side

Command R+ and Granite 4.1 8b specifications
Command R+Granite 4.1 8b
ProviderCohereIBM
Noometry Index32.437.4
Released2024-08-30—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Granite 4.1 8b
LMArena Coding11871312
LMArena WebDev—1192
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%—
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Granite 4.1 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts11861293
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Granite 4.1 8b
LMArena Math11881312
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Granite 4.1 8b
LMArena Expert11741309
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Granite 4.1 8b
LMArena Non-English12161261
LMArena Chinese12261337
LMArena Russian12271240
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Granite 4.1 8b
LMArena Instruction Following11971269
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Granite 4.1 8b
LMArena Longer Query12301275

Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+Granite 4.1 8b
LMArena Text12291290
LMArena Creative Writing12351251
LMArena Multi-Turn12131268
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Granite 4.1 8b?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R+ or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?

Granite 4.1 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Granite 4.1 8b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper