Noometry

Model comparison

Command R+ vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct NVIDIA

37.6

Rank #203 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 25.0 to 9.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 41.9% for Command R+ and 48.2% for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct.

Side by side

Command R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
ProviderCohereNVIDIA
Noometry Index32.437.6
Released2024-08-302024-12-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3414

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%38.7%
LMArena Coding11871272
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%48.2%
LiveBench Coding19.1%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+63.5%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11861266
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Math11881271
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Expert11741242
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12161245
LMArena Chinese12261263
LMArena Russian12271227
LMArena French1209—
LMArena German1216—
LMArena Japanese1166—
LMArena Korean1138—
LMArena Spanish1189—

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11971252
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context Too close to call

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12301238

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)

BenchmarkCommand R+Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Text12291283
LMArena Creative Writing12351269
LMArena Multi-Turn12131275
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R+ or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper