Model comparison
Command R+ vs GPT-4.5
GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and GPT-4.5 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GPT-4.5 leads 52.5 to 38.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Coding: 19.1% for Command R+ and 75.2% for GPT-4.5.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R+ | GPT-4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-02-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-4.5 leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | 75.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1396 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 44.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 39.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R+: —, GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 17.5% |
Reasoning GPT-4.5 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | 34.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | 71.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1403 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | 64.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 136.74 |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | 69% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 10.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3.2% |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.7 |
Math GPT-4.5 leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | 69.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1412 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 37.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 78.6% |
Knowledge Command R+ leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1394 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 68.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 5.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 13.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R+: —, GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1195 |
| VPCT | — | 45% |
Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1413 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1421 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1392 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1419 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | 72.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1404 |
Long Context GPT-4.5 leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1406 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 63.9% |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | GPT-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1444 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | 61.5% |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 75.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1258 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than GPT-4.5?
GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or GPT-4.5 better for coding?
GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and GPT-4.5 share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.