Model comparison
Command R+ vs Dolly 2.0-12b
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
DatabricksSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 5 categories and Dolly 2.0-12b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R+ leads 43.5 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Dolly 2.0-12b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Databricks |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 25.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2023-04-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Command R+ leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 776 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Dolly 2.0-12b leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 804 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 89.67 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 70.8% |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
| PIQA | — | 75.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 61.8% |
Math Command R+ leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 871 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Dolly 2.0-12b: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 69.4% | 26.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 39.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 56.3% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 39.2% |
Multilingual Command R+ leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 836 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 836 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Command R+ leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 814 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Dolly 2.0-12b: —
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | — |
Writing & Preference Command R+ leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 851 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 864 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 740 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Dolly 2.0-12b?
Command R+ is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Dolly 2.0-12b better for coding?
Command R+ scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.1 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Dolly 2.0-12b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Dolly 2.0-12b has 17.