Model comparison

Command R+ vs DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Command R+ Cohere

32.4

Rank #257 Confirmed

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 1 category and DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 25.6 to 9.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 33.8% for Command R+ and 48.6% for DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024).

Side by side

Command R+ and DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) specifications
Command R+DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)
ProviderCohereDeepSeek
Noometry Index32.437.6
Released2024-08-302024-09-06
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

Command R+: 29.1 (#309), DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)
BigCodeBench Instruct33.8%48.6%
LMArena Coding11871309
BigCodeBench Complete41.9%53.2%
HumanEval+56.7%83.5%
MBPP+63.5%74.1%
Aider Polyglot—17.8%
LiveBench Coding19.1%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

Command R+: 9.2 (#344), DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)
LMArena Hard Prompts11861289
SimpleBench17.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning24.8%—
DTBench54.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis38.1%—
LMCA5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index119.34—
LiveBench31.8%—

Math DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

Command R+: 28.9 (#242), DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)
LMArena Math11881288
LiveBench Math21.3%—

Knowledge Command R+ leads

Command R+: 36.4 (#169), DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)
LMArena Expert11741266
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.9%—
MMLU69.4%—

Multilingual DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

Command R+: 38.6 (#227), DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)
LMArena Non-English12161273
LMArena Chinese12261318
LMArena French12091289
LMArena German12161258
LMArena Japanese11661228
LMArena Korean11381209
LMArena Russian12271289
LMArena Spanish11891248

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

Command R+: 60.0 (#254), DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)
LMArena Instruction Following11971280
LiveBench Instruction Following57.6%—

Long Context DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

Command R+: 37.3 (#219), DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)
LMArena Longer Query12301301

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

Command R+: 43.5 (#228), DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand R+DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)
LMArena Text12291294
LMArena Creative Writing12351285
LMArena Multi-Turn12131297
LiveBench Language29.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R+ better than DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command R+ or DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.7 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command R+ and DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper