Model comparison
Command A vs Yi-1.5-34B
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command A leads 37.1 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Command A | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1169 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Yi-1.5-34B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1160 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1121 |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1139 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command A | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1153 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Yi-1.5-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.