Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Command A

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Command A in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 25.8.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Command A specifications
Codellama 34b InstructCommand A
ProviderMetaCohere
Noometry Index30.836.5
Released—2025-03-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked1424

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Command A: 27.2 (#322)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructCommand A
LMArena Coding10461330
Aider Polyglot—12%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Command A: 35.9 (#40)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructCommand A
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—57.1%

Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Command A: 18.3 (#283)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructCommand A
LMArena Hard Prompts10321326
Kagi LLM Benchmark—28.8%
DTBench—61.3%
LMCA—10.3%

Math Command A leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Command A: 36.2 (#171)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructCommand A
LMArena Math10561300

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Command A: 37.1 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructCommand A
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
LMArena Expert—1295

Multilingual Command A leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Command A: 45.3 (#170)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructCommand A
LMArena Non-English10111313
LMArena Chinese9761327
LMArena French—1351
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Japanese—1285
LMArena Korean—1285
LMArena Russian—1314
LMArena Spanish—1347

Instruction Following Command A leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Command A: 69.1 (#177)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructCommand A
LMArena Instruction Following10281309

Long Context Command A leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Command A: 40.6 (#151)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructCommand A
LMArena Longer Query10131334

Writing & Preference Command A leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Command A: 47.6 (#208)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructCommand A
LMArena Text10661331
LMArena Creative Writing10321319
LMArena Multi-Turn10151339
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1145

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Command A?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Command A better for coding?

Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Command A share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Command A has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper