Model comparison
Command A vs Wizardlm 70b
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.5 to 29.8.
Side by side
| Command A | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 70b leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1081 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1079 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1093 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | Command A | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1108 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Wizardlm 70b?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.