Model comparison
Command A vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Command A | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 33.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Command A | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1149 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)
| Benchmark | Command A | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1138 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Command A | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1159 |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)
| Benchmark | Command A | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1131 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Command A | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1063 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Command A | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1116 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)
| Benchmark | Command A | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1155 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)
| Benchmark | Command A | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1099 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.