Model comparison
Command A vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
StepFunSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 2 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 39.2 to 27.2.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 39.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1339 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Step 1o Turbo 202506: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Too close to call
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1318 |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1308 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command A: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1380 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1327 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1310 |
Long Context Too close to call
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1348 |
Writing & Preference Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)
| Benchmark | Command A | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1307 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1340 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.