Model comparison

Command A vs Nova 2 Lite

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Nova 2 Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2 Lite leads 40.7 to 27.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 57.1% for Command A and 27.1% for Nova 2 Lite.
  • Nova 2 Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
  • Nova 2 Lite accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
  • Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command A and Nova 2 Lite specifications
Command ANova 2 Lite
ProviderCohereAmazon
Noometry Index36.539.7
Released2025-03-132025-12-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K1M
Max output8K64K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$10$2.50
Results tracked2419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2 Lite leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANova 2 Lite
LMArena Coding13301385
Aider Polyglot12%—

Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANova 2 Lite
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%27.1%

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANova 2 Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts13261364
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math Nova 2 Lite leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANova 2 Lite
LMArena Math13001359

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANova 2 Lite
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%5.1%
LMArena Expert12951358

Multilingual Nova 2 Lite leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANova 2 Lite
LMArena Non-English13131337
LMArena Chinese13271364
LMArena French13511381
LMArena German13411343
LMArena Japanese12851271
LMArena Korean12851284
LMArena Russian13141343
LMArena Spanish13471373

Instruction Following Nova 2 Lite leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANova 2 Lite
LMArena Instruction Following13091335

Long Context Too close to call

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANova 2 Lite
LMArena Longer Query13341335

Writing & Preference Nova 2 Lite leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand ANova 2 Lite
LMArena Text13311362
LMArena Creative Writing13191291
LMArena Multi-Turn13391338
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Command A or Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova 2 Lite does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Nova 2 Lite share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper