Model comparison

Command A vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command A leads 47.6 to 27.1.

Side by side

Command A and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Command APhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderCohereMicrosoft
Noometry Index36.529.7
Released2025-03-132024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked2419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand APhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding13301039
Aider Polyglot12%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand APhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand APhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13261028
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math Command A leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand APhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math13001089

Knowledge Command A leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand APhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1295984
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual Command A leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand APhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13131000
LMArena Chinese13271016
LMArena French13511039
LMArena German13411006
LMArena Japanese1285899
LMArena Korean1285856
LMArena Russian13141004
LMArena Spanish13471059

Instruction Following Command A leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand APhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13091023

Long Context Command A leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand APhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1334996

Writing & Preference Command A leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand APhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text13311050
LMArena Creative Writing13191024
LMArena Multi-Turn1339989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command A or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.8 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper