Model comparison
Command A vs phi-3-medium 14B
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command A leads 36.5 to 9.1.
Side by side
| Command A | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Command A | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Command A: 17.7 (#276), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | Command A | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Command A | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command A: 45.5 (#166), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | — |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command A: 69.3 (#172), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Command A: 40.6 (#147), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command A: 47.8 (#204), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.