Model comparison
Command A vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 35.3 to 26.8.
Side by side
| Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2024-12-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.3 (#212)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1272 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 24.0 (#156)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1266 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Too close to call
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 32.9 (#182)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1271 |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 33.5 (#194)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1242 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.7 (#212)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 66.2 (#208)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1252 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1239 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.6 (#197)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1283 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.