Model comparison
Command A vs Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
Command A and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 35.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 35.4.
Side by side
| Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 35.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 34.4 (#235)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1183 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 22.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1174 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 33.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1195 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1169 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1176 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 61.3 (#246)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1174 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.8 (#239)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1181 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 39.7 (#245)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1193 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1154 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b?
Command A and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 35.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Command A or Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has 11.