Model comparison
Command A vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Command A and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 35.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 36.1.
Side by side
| Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1223 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1203 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1230 |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1167 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1201 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)
| Benchmark | Command A | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1227 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Command A and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.5 vs 35.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Command A or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.6 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.