Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Command A
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Command A score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 36.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 2 categories and Command A in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 34.8 to 27.2.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | 2025-03-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 256K |
| Max output | 4K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), Command A: 27.2 (#322)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | 1330 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: —, Command A: 35.9 (#40)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 57.1% |
Reasoning C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), Command A: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | 1326 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 28.8% |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| LMCA | — | 10.3% |
Math Command A leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), Command A: 36.2 (#171)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | 1300 |
Knowledge Command A leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), Command A: 37.1 (#159)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | 1295 |
Multilingual Command A leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), Command A: 45.3 (#170)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | 1327 |
| LMArena French | 1248 | 1351 |
| LMArena German | 1199 | 1341 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | 1285 |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | 1285 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1314 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | 1347 |
Instruction Following Command A leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), Command A: 69.1 (#177)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | 1309 |
Long Context Command A leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), Command A: 40.6 (#151)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | 1334 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), Command A: 47.6 (#208)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | 1331 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | 1319 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1339 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1145 |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Command A?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Command A score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 36.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or Command A better for coding?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.8 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command A does, with 256K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Command A share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Command A has 24.