Model comparison
Command A vs Hy3
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
TencentSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.8 to 27.2.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Command A | Hy3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 44.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-07-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 8K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.0825 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.33 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1464 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Hy3: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1447 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1475 |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1460 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1493 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1456 |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1426 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Hy3?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Hy3?
Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A or Hy3 better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Hy3 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.