Model comparison
Command A vs Mistral 7B
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Mistral AISummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command A leads 37.1 to 7.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.3% for Command A and 42.5% for Mistral 7B.
- Mistral 7B is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A.
- Command A accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 8K.
Side by side
| Command A | Mistral 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 23.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2023-09-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | 8K |
| Max output | 8K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1082 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 19.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 27.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 36% |
| MBPP+ | — | 42.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Mistral 7B: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Command A leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1067 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 42.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 47.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 56.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.21 |
| HellaSwag | — | 81% |
| PIQA | — | 83% |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.3% |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1085 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.7% |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1036 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 15.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 87.4% |
| MMLU | — | 62.5% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 79.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 75.2% |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1012 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1009 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1037 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 987 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 878 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1018 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1026 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1060 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1060 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)
| Benchmark | Command A | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1090 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1062 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Mistral 7B?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command A's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Mistral 7B?
Mistral 7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Command A lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A or Mistral 7B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (27.2 vs 26.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command A does, with 256K tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Mistral 7B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.