Model comparison
Command A vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 4 Argon in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 36.2.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1550 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1678 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 55% |
| SciCode | — | 61.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 82.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 13,718 |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1548 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 27.1% |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1536 |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1553 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command A: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 54.4% |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1523 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1610 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1537 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1497 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1538 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1549 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1557 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemini 4 Argon share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.