Model comparison
Command A vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
GoogleSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 10.3% for Command A and 53.8% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
- Both cost about the same: $2.50 input and $10 output per million tokens.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 56.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-02-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 8K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $12 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 71 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1484 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 75.6% |
| DeepSWE | — | 11.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1447 |
| SciCode | — | 58.9% |
| GSO | — | 22.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 72.1% |
| MirrorCode | — | 8.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,161 |
| AlgoTune | — | 2.02 |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 80.2% |
| APEX-Agents | — | 35.3% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 26% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.8% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 22% |
| BALROG | — | 57% |
| ExploitBench | — | 26.1% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.8% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1211 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 77% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,774 |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1485 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | 97.1% |
| LMCA | 10.3% | 53.8% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 77.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 79.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 97.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 98% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 55% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 36.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 79.4% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 14.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.77 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59 |
Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1485 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 59.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 26.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 86.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 36.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 10.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1485 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 46.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 73.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command A: —, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1296 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 26.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 26.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1477 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1529 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1487 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1491 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 1493 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1498 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1479 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1466 |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1483 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 16.9% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1481 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1482 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | 1491 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1488 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1142 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command A or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Command A is cheaper. It lists at $2.50 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists at $2 and $12.
Is Command A or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71.