Model comparison

Codestral vs Ministral 8B

Codestral is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Codestral's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Codestral Mistral AI

30.6

Rank #290 Reported

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

28.2

Rank #325 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Ministral 8B leads 35.0 to 27.3.
  • Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for Codestral.
  • Ministral 8B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
  • Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codestral and Ministral 8B specifications
CodestralMinistral 8B
ProviderMistral AIMistral AI
Noometry Index30.628.2
Released2024-05-292024-10-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K262K
Max output8K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.90$0.15
Results tracked717

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Ministral 8B leads

Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMinistral 8B
Aider Polyglot11.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct41.8%—
LMArena Coding—1202
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—
ALE-Bench137.78—
HumanEval+73.8%—
MBPP+61.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codestral: —, Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMinistral 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—11.1%

Reasoning Codestral leads

Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMinistral 8B
Kagi LLM Benchmark32.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1191
DTBench—45.7%

Math Not comparable

Codestral: —, Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMinistral 8B
LMArena Math—1188
MATH Level 5—14.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codestral: —, Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMinistral 8B
GPQA Diamond—27.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%
LMArena Expert—1170

Multilingual Not comparable

Codestral: —, Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMinistral 8B
LMArena Non-English—1165
LMArena Chinese—1193
LMArena Russian—1195

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codestral: —, Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMinistral 8B
LMArena Instruction Following—1161

Long Context Not comparable

Codestral: —, Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMinistral 8B
LMArena Longer Query—1212

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codestral: —, Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralMinistral 8B
LMArena Text—1191
LMArena Creative Writing—1175
LMArena Multi-Turn—1166

Frequently asked questions

Is Codestral better than Ministral 8B?

Codestral is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 3.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Codestral's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Ministral 8B?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Codestral lists at $0.30 and $0.90.

Is Codestral or Ministral 8B better for coding?

Ministral 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.0 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 8B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Codestral and Ministral 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper