Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Wizardlm 70b
Codellama 70b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Wizardlm 70b in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 37.6 to 31.4.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1079 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Multilingual Wizardlm 70b leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Wizardlm 70b leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 70b leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Wizardlm 70b?
Codellama 70b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.