Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct

Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 57.7 to 51.9.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 2b Instruct
ProviderMetaIBM
Noometry Index33.733.2
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 2b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1149
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10521138

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Math—1159

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert—1131

Multilingual Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English9921068
LMArena Chinese—1139
LMArena Russian—1063

Instruction Following Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10241116

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1155

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Text10571127
LMArena Creative Writing—1116
LMArena Multi-Turn—1099

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?

Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper