Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 41.2 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1302 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1316 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.