Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 42.1 to 24.9.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1299 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.0 vs 37.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.