Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.1 to 33.4.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Codellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
ProviderMetaMiniMax
Noometry Index33.743.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked741

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1469
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
ALE-Bench—640.02
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts10521447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%
LMArena Math—1429

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
LMArena Expert—1461

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English9921420
LMArena Chinese—1463
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Korean—1372
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following10241433

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query—1445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text10571433
LMArena Creative Writing—1404
EQ-Bench 4—1150
LMArena Multi-Turn—1442

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiniMax-M3 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper