Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs GLM-5V-Turbo

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.3

Rank #236 Confirmed

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.1

Rank #86 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 33.6.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and GLM-5V-Turbo specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
ProviderMetaZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index33.343.1
Released—2026-04-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena WebDev—1400
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1467
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts10521443

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Math—1440

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Expert—1451

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Vision—1264
LMArena Document—1416

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Non-English9921420
LMArena Chinese—1488
LMArena French—1443
LMArena German—1422
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Russian—1432
LMArena Spanish—1446

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following10241422

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Text10571437
LMArena Creative Writing—1414
LMArena Multi-Turn—1432

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and GLM-5V-Turbo share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper