Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Meta
NVIDIASummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 40.5 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 37.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 38.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 48.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1272 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1266 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1271 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1242 |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1227 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1252 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1238 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1283 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.