Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.9 to 33.6.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 46.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1618 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1538 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1511 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1497 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1548 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1265 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1490 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1500 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1463 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.