Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 33.4.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Codellama 70b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderMetaXiaomi
Noometry Index33.748.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1504
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10521482
CritPt—12%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProofBench—63%
LMArena Math—1468

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert—1501

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English9921434
LMArena Chinese—1511
LMArena French—1475
LMArena Russian—1409
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10241463

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text10571455
LMArena Creative Writing—1400
LMArena Multi-Turn—1451

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper