Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs o1-mini

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 8.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and o1-mini specifications
MiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
ProviderXiaomiOpenAI
Noometry Index48.534.0
Released2026-09-212024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked1939

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Coding15041362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
LMArena WebDev1637—
SciCode51.3%—
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts14821333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
CritPt12%—
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Math14681358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
ProofBench63%—
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Expert15011316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), o1-mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Non-English14341289
LMArena Chinese15111314
LMArena French14751293
LMArena Russian14091283
LMArena Spanish14561303
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following14631304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Longer Query14631320

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Text14551317
LMArena Creative Writing14001244
LMArena Multi-Turn14511314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than o1-mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or o1-mini better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and o1-mini share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper