Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads 35.4 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 35.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 34.4 (#235)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1183 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 22.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1174 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 33.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1195 |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.4 (#246)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1169 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 61.3 (#246)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1174 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 35.8 (#239)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1181 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b: 39.7 (#245)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1193 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1154 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b?
Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Tulu 3 8b has 11.