Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
NVIDIASummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 36.1 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 35.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1223 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1203 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1230 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1167 |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1201 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.