Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.0 to 33.4.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderMetaxAI
Noometry Index33.746.2
Released—2026-03-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked720

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1457
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search—1204

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Hard Prompts10521448
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Math—1442

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert—1445

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English9921440
LMArena Chinese—1475
LMArena French—1466
LMArena German—1456
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1416
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1447

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following10241420

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query—1431

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text10571450
LMArena Creative Writing—1436
LMArena Multi-Turn—1452

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper