Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs o1-mini

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 8 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 8.8.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
ProviderxAIOpenAI
Noometry Index46.234.0
Released2026-03-092024-09-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked2039

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
LMArena Coding14571362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
Cybench—10%
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts14481333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
LMArena Math14421358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
LMArena Expert14451316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), o1-mini: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
LMArena Non-English14401289
LMArena Chinese14751314
LMArena French14661293
LMArena German14561278
LMArena Japanese14051245
LMArena Korean14161223
LMArena Russian14571283
LMArena Spanish14471303

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following14201304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
LMArena Longer Query14311320

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-Agento1-mini
LMArena Text14501317
LMArena Creative Writing14361244
LMArena Multi-Turn14521314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than o1-mini?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or o1-mini better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and o1-mini share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper