Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.3

Rank #236 Confirmed

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 58.9 to 52.1.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
ProviderMetaIBM
Noometry Index33.331.8
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1186
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10521146

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Math—1152

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert—1142

Multilingual Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English9921099
LMArena Chinese—1145
LMArena Russian—1092

Instruction Following Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10241131

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1162

Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Text10571150
LMArena Creative Writing—1129
LMArena Multi-Turn—1108

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper