Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemma 3 12B

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3 12B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 12B leads 45.7 to 24.8.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 3 12B specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
ProviderMetaGoogle
Noometry Index33.732.1
Released—2025-03-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked724

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
SciCode—17.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1281
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—30.4%

Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
LMArena Hard Prompts10521309
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—48.8%
LMCA—4.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—123.5

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.7%
LMArena Math—1307

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
GPQA Diamond—39.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.4%
LMArena Expert—1248

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 12B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
MindCube—46.7%

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
LMArena Non-English9921318
LMArena German—1370
LMArena Russian—1335

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
LMArena Instruction Following10241299

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
LMArena Longer Query—1317

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 12B
LMArena Text10571334
LMArena Creative Writing—1331
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1126
LMArena Multi-Turn—1334

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemma 3 12B?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemma 3 12B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 3 12B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper