Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs o1-mini

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and o1-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 34.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where o1-mini leads 43.6 to 29.1.
  • Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and o1-mini specifications
Granite 3.1 2b Instructo1-mini
ProviderIBMOpenAI
Noometry Index33.234.0
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1239

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Coding11491362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b Instructo1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts11381333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Math11591358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Expert11311316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multilingual o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Non-English10681289
LMArena Chinese11391314
LMArena Russian10631283
LMArena French—1293
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following11161304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Longer Query11551320

Writing & Preference o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Text11271317
LMArena Creative Writing11161244
LMArena Multi-Turn10991314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than o1-mini?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and o1-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 34.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or o1-mini better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and o1-mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper