Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Command R
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Command R in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command R leads 35.7 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Command R | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Cohere |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Command R: 29.3 (#306)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 37.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 45.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 17.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1169 |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Command R: 13.8 (#331)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1164 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 21.9% |
| DTBench | — | 46.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 33.3% |
| LMCA | — | 9.2% |
| LiveBench | — | 27.5% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Command R: 28.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 19.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1155 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Command R: 31.0 (#221)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1138 |
| MMLU | — | 65.2% |
Multilingual Command R leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Command R: 35.7 (#245)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1174 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1182 |
| LMArena French | — | 1162 |
| LMArena German | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1143 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1163 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1151 |
Instruction Following Command R leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Command R: 58.1 (#261)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1167 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 55.6% |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Command R: 36.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1198 |
Writing & Preference Command R leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Command R: 38.2 (#254)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Command R |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1187 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1170 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1163 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 16.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Command R?
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Command R better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Command R share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Command R has 29.