Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Command A

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Command A in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 24.8.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Command A specifications
Codellama 70b InstructCommand A
ProviderMetaCohere
Noometry Index33.736.5
Released—2025-03-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked724

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Command A: 27.2 (#322)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructCommand A
Aider Polyglot—12%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1330
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Command A: 35.9 (#40)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructCommand A
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—57.1%

Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Command A: 18.3 (#283)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructCommand A
LMArena Hard Prompts10521326
Kagi LLM Benchmark—28.8%
DTBench—61.3%
LMCA—10.3%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Command A: 36.2 (#171)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructCommand A
LMArena Math—1300

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Command A: 37.1 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructCommand A
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
LMArena Expert—1295

Multilingual Command A leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Command A: 45.3 (#170)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructCommand A
LMArena Non-English9921313
LMArena Chinese—1327
LMArena French—1351
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Japanese—1285
LMArena Korean—1285
LMArena Russian—1314
LMArena Spanish—1347

Instruction Following Command A leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Command A: 69.1 (#177)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructCommand A
LMArena Instruction Following10241309

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Command A: 40.6 (#151)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructCommand A
LMArena Longer Query—1334

Writing & Preference Command A leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Command A: 47.6 (#208)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructCommand A
LMArena Text10571331
LMArena Creative Writing—1319
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1145
LMArena Multi-Turn—1339

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Command A?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Command A better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Command A share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Command A has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper