Model comparison

Command A vs o1-mini

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 7 categories and o1-mini in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Command A leads 35.9 to 24.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 12% for Command A and 32.9% for o1-mini.
  • Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command A and o1-mini specifications
Command Ao1-mini
ProviderCohereOpenAI
Noometry Index36.534.0
Released2025-03-132024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked2439

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1-mini leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand Ao1-mini
Aider Polyglot12%32.9%
LMArena Coding13301362
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Command A leads

Command A: 35.9 (#40), o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand Ao1-mini
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Command A leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand Ao1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts13261333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
DTBench61.3%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
LMCA10.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math Too close to call

Command A: 36.2 (#171), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand Ao1-mini
LMArena Math13001358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Command A leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand Ao1-mini
LMArena Expert12951316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual Command A leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand Ao1-mini
LMArena Non-English13131289
LMArena Chinese13271314
LMArena French13511293
LMArena German13411278
LMArena Japanese12851245
LMArena Korean12851223
LMArena Russian13141283
LMArena Spanish13471303

Instruction Following Command A leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand Ao1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following13091304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context Too close to call

Command A: 40.6 (#151), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand Ao1-mini
LMArena Longer Query13341320

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Command A: 47.6 (#208), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand Ao1-mini
LMArena Text13311317
LMArena Creative Writing13191244
LMArena Multi-Turn13391314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than o1-mini?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command A or o1-mini better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command A and o1-mini share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper