Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.0 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 45.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1439 |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1403 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1414 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.