Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 42.9 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (28.5 vs 28.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.