Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 29.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.