Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.1 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Codellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
ProviderMetaMiniMax
Noometry Index30.843.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1441

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding10461469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
ALE-Bench—640.02
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts10321447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math10561429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
LMArena Expert—1461

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English10111420
LMArena Chinese9761463
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Korean—1372
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following10281433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query10131445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text10661433
LMArena Creative Writing10321404
LMArena Multi-Turn10151442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiniMax-M3 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper